OpenText Analytics Database 26.2.x – Gap filling and interpolation (GFI)

Data-Analysis: Constant interpolation

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

Given known input timestamps at 03:00:00 and 03:00:05 in the sample TickStore schema, how might you determine the bid price at 03:00:03?

A common interpolation scheme used on financial data is to set the bid price to the last seen value so far. This scheme is referred to as constant interpolation, in which the database computes a new value based on the previous input records.

Note

Constant is OpenText™ Analytics Database's default interpolation scheme. Another interpolation scheme, linear, is discussed in an upcoming topic.

Returning to the problem query, here is the table output, which shows a 5-second lag between bids at 03:00:00 and 03:00:05:

=> SELECT * FROM TickStore;
         ts          | symbol | bid
---------------------+--------+------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 | XYZ    |   10
 2009-01-01 03:00:05 | XYZ    | 10.5
(2 rows)

Using constant interpolation, the interpolated bid price of XYZ remains at $10.0 at 3:00:03, which falls between the two known data inputs (3:00:00 PM and 3:00:05). At 3:00:05, the value changes to $10.5. The known data points are represented by a red dot, and the interpolated value at 3:00:03 is represented by the blue star.

In order to write a query that makes the input rows more uniform, you first need to understand the TIMESERIES clause and time series aggregate functions.

Data-Analysis: TIMESERIES clause and aggregates

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

The SELECT..TIMESERIES clause and time series aggregates help solve the problem of gaps in input records by normalizing the data into 3-second time slices and interpolating the bid price when it finds gaps.

TIMESERIES clause

The TIMESERIES clause is an important component of time series analytics computation. It performs gap filling and interpolation (GFI) to generate time slices missing from the input records. The clause applies to the timestamp columns/expressions in the data, and takes the following form:

TIMESERIES slice_time AS 'length_and_time_unit_expression'
OVER ( ... [ window-partition-clause[ , ... ] ] 
... ORDER BY time_expression )
... [ ORDER BY table_column [ , ... ] ]

Note

The TIMESERIES clause requires an ORDER BY operation on the timestamp column.

Time series aggregate functions

The Timeseries Aggregate (TSA) functions TS_FIRST_VALUE and TS_LAST_VALUE evaluate the values of a given set of variables over time and group those values into a window for analysis and aggregation.

TSA functions process the data that belongs to each time slice. One output row is produced per time slice or per partition per time slice if a partition expression is present.

The following table shows 3-second time slices where:

The first two rows fall within the first time slice, which runs from 3:00:00 to 3:00:02. These are the input rows for the TSA function's output for the time slice starting at 3:00:00.
The second two rows fall within the second time slice, which runs from 3:00:03 to 3:00:05. These are the input rows for the TSA function's output for the time slice starting at 3:00:03.

The result is the start of each time slice.

Examples

The following examples compare the values returned with and without the TS_FIRST_VALUE TSA function.

This example shows the TIMESERIES clause without the TS_FIRST_VALUE TSA function.

=> SELECT slice_time, bid FROM TickStore TIMESERIES slice_time AS '3 seconds' OVER(PARTITION by TickStore.bid ORDER BY ts);

This example shows both the TIMESERIES clause and the TS_FIRST_VALUE TSA function. The query returns the values of the bid column, as determined by the specified constant interpolation scheme.

=> SELECT slice_time, TS_FIRST_VALUE(bid, 'CONST') bid FROM TickStore
   TIMESERIES slice_time AS '3 seconds' OVER(PARTITION by symbol ORDER BY ts);

The database interpolates the last known value and fills in the missing datapoint, returning 10 at 3:00:03:

First query Interpolated value

     slice_time      | bid
---------------------+-----
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 |  10
 2009-01-01 03:00:03 | 10.5
(2 rows)

==>

     slice_time      | bid
---------------------+-----
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 |  10
 2009-01-01 03:00:03 |  10
(2 rows)

Data-Analysis: Time series rounding

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

OpenText™ Analytics Database calculates all time series as equal intervals relative to the timestamp 2000-01-01 00:00:00. The database rounds time series timestamps as needed, to conform with this baseline. Start times are also rounded down to the nearest whole unit for the specified interval.

Given this logic, the TIMESERIES clause generates series of timestamps as described in the following sections.

Minutes

Time series of minutes are rounded down to full minutes. For example, the following statement specifies a time span of 00:00:03 - 00:05:50:

=> SELECT ts FROM (
    SELECT '2015-01-04 00:00:03'::TIMESTAMP AS tm
      UNION
    SELECT '2015-01-04 00:05:50'::TIMESTAMP AS tm
   ) t
   TIMESERIES ts AS '1 minute' OVER (ORDER BY tm);

The database rounds down the time series start and end times to full minutes, 00:00:00 and 00:05:00, respectively:


         ts
---------------------
 2015-01-04 00:00:00
 2015-01-04 00:01:00
 2015-01-04 00:02:00
 2015-01-04 00:03:00
 2015-01-04 00:04:00
 2015-01-04 00:05:00
(6 rows)

Weeks

Because the baseline timestamp 2000-01-01 00:00:00 is a Saturday, all time series of weeks start on Saturday. The database rounds down the series start and end timestamps accordingly. For example, the following statement specifies a time span of 12/10/99 - 01/10/00:

=> SELECT ts FROM (
     SELECT '1999-12-10 00:00:00'::TIMESTAMP AS tm
       UNION
     SELECT '2000-01-10 23:59:59'::TIMESTAMP AS tm
     ) t
     TIMESERIES ts AS '1 week' OVER (ORDER BY tm);

The specified time span starts on Friday (12/10/99), so the database starts the time series on the preceding Saturday, 12/04/99. The time series ends on the last Saturday within the time span, 01/08/00:

         ts
---------------------
 1999-12-04 00:00:00
 1999-12-11 00:00:00
 1999-12-18 00:00:00
 1999-12-25 00:00:00
 2000-01-01 00:00:00
 2000-01-08 00:00:00
(6 rows)

Months

Time series of months are divided into equal 30-day intervals, relative to the baseline timestamp 2000-01-01 00:00:00. For example, the following statement specifies a time span of 09/01/99 - 12/31/00:

=> SELECT ts FROM (
     SELECT '1999-09-01 00:00:00'::TIMESTAMP AS tm
       UNION
     SELECT '2000-12-31 23:59:59'::TIMESTAMP AS tm
   ) t
   TIMESERIES ts AS '1 month' OVER (ORDER BY tm);

The database generates a series of 30-day intervals, where each timestamp is rounded up or down, relative to the baseline timestamp:

         ts
---------------------
 1999-08-04 00:00:00
 1999-09-03 00:00:00
 1999-10-03 00:00:00
 1999-11-02 00:00:00
 1999-12-02 00:00:00
 2000-01-01 00:00:00
 2000-01-31 00:00:00
 2000-03-01 00:00:00
 2000-03-31 00:00:00
 2000-04-30 00:00:00
 2000-05-30 00:00:00
 2000-06-29 00:00:00
 2000-07-29 00:00:00
 2000-08-28 00:00:00
 2000-09-27 00:00:00
 2000-10-27 00:00:00
 2000-11-26 00:00:00
 2000-12-26 00:00:00
(18 rows)

Years

Time series of years are divided into equal 365-day intervals. If a time span overlaps leap years since or before the baseline timestamp 2000-01-01 00:00:00, the database rounds the series timestamps accordingly.

For example, the following statement specifies a time span of 01/01/95 - 05/08/09, which overlaps four leap years, including the baseline timestamp:

=> SELECT ts FROM (
      SELECT '1995-01-01 00:00:00'::TIMESTAMP AS tm
        UNION
      SELECT '2009-05-08'::TIMESTAMP AS tm
    ) t timeseries ts AS '1 year' over (ORDER BY tm);

The database generates a series of timestamps that are rounded up or down, relative to the baseline timestamp:

         ts
---------------------
 1994-01-02 00:00:00
 1995-01-02 00:00:00
 1996-01-02 00:00:00
 1997-01-01 00:00:00
 1998-01-01 00:00:00
 1999-01-01 00:00:00
 2000-01-01 00:00:00
 2000-12-31 00:00:00
 2001-12-31 00:00:00
 2002-12-31 00:00:00
 2003-12-31 00:00:00
 2004-12-30 00:00:00
 2005-12-30 00:00:00
 2006-12-30 00:00:00
 2007-12-30 00:00:00
 2008-12-29 00:00:00
(16 rows)

Data-Analysis: Linear interpolation

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

Instead of interpolating data points based on the last seen value (Constant interpolation), linear interpolation is where OpenText™ Analytics Database interpolates values in a linear slope based on the specified time slice.

The query that follows uses linear interpolation to place the input records in 2-second time slices and return the first bid value for each symbol/time slice combination (the value at the start of the time slice):

=> SELECT slice_time, TS_FIRST_VALUE(bid, 'LINEAR') bid FROM Tickstore
   TIMESERIES slice_time AS '2 seconds' OVER(PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts);
     slice_time      | bid
---------------------+------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 |   10
 2009-01-01 03:00:02 | 10.2
 2009-01-01 03:00:04 | 10.4
(3 rows)

The following figure illustrates the previous query results, showing the 2-second time gaps (3:00:02 and 3:00:04) in which no input record occurs. Note that the interpolated bid price of XYZ changes to 10.2 at 3:00:02 and 10.3 at 3:00:03 and 10.4 at 3:00:04, all of which fall between the two known data inputs (3:00:00 and 3:00:05). At 3:00:05, the value would change to 10.5.

Note

The known data points above are represented by a red dot, and the interpolated values are represented by blue stars.

The following is a side-by-side comparison of constant and linear interpolation schemes.

CONST interpolation	LINEAR interpolation

Data-Analysis: GFI examples

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

This topic illustrates some of the queries you can write using the constant and linear interpolation schemes.

Constant interpolation

The first query uses TS_FIRST_VALUE() and the TIMESERIES clause to place the input records in 3-second time slices and return the first bid value for each symbol/time slice combination (the value at the start of the time slice).

Note

The TIMESERIES clause requires an ORDER BY operation on the TIMESTAMP column.

=> SELECT slice_time, symbol, TS_FIRST_VALUE(bid) AS first_bid FROM TickStore
   TIMESERIES slice_time AS '3 seconds' OVER (PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts);

Because the bid price of stock XYZ is 10.0 at 3:00:03, the first_bid value of the second time slice, which starts at 3:00:03 is till 10.0 (instead of 10.5) because the input value of 10.5 does not occur until 3:00:05. In this case, the interpolated value is inferred from the last value seen on stock XYZ for time 3:00:03:

     slice_time      | symbol | first_bid
---------------------+--------+-----------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 | XYZ    |        10
 2009-01-01 03:00:03 | XYZ    |        10
(2 rows)

The next example places the input records in 2-second time slices to return the first bid value for each symbol/time slice combination:

=> SELECT slice_time, symbol, TS_FIRST_VALUE(bid) AS first_bid FROM TickStore
   TIMESERIES slice_time AS '2 seconds' OVER (PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts);

The result now contains three records in 2-second increments, all of which occur between the first input row at 03:00:00 and the second input row at 3:00:05. Note that the second and third output record correspond to a time slice where there is no input record:

     slice_time      | symbol | first_bid
---------------------+--------+-----------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 | XYZ    |        10
2009-01-01 03:00:02 | XYZ    |        10
2009-01-01 03:00:04 | XYZ    |        10
(3 rows)

Using the same table schema, the next query uses TS_LAST_VALUE(), with the TIMESERIES clause to return the last values of each time slice (the values at the end of the time slices).

Note

Time series aggregate functions process the data that belongs to each time slice. One output row is produced per time slice or per partition per time slice if a partition expression is present.

=> SELECT slice_time, symbol, TS_LAST_VALUE(bid) AS last_bid FROM TickStore
   TIMESERIES slice_time AS '2 seconds' OVER (PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts);

Notice that the last value output row is 10.5 because the value 10.5 at time 3:00:05 was the last point inside the 2-second time slice that started at 3:00:04:

     slice_time      | symbol | last_bid
---------------------+--------+----------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 | XYZ    |       10
 2009-01-01 03:00:02 | XYZ    |       10
 2009-01-01 03:00:04 | XYZ    |     10.5
(3 rows)

Remember that because constant interpolation is the default, the same results are returned if you write the query using the CONST parameter as follows:

=> SELECT slice_time, symbol, TS_LAST_VALUE(bid, 'CONST') AS last_bid FROM TickStore
   TIMESERIES slice_time AS '2 seconds' OVER (PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts);

Linear interpolation

Based on the same input records described in the constant interpolation examples, which specify 2-second time slices, the result of TS_LAST_VALUE with linear interpolation is as follows:

=> SELECT slice_time, symbol, TS_LAST_VALUE(bid, 'linear') AS last_bid   FROM TickStore
   TIMESERIES slice_time AS '2 seconds' OVER (PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts);

In the results, no last_bid value is returned for the last row because the query specified TS_LAST_VALUE, and there is no data point after the 3:00:04 time slice to interpolate.

     slice_time      | symbol | last_bid
---------------------+--------+----------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 | XYZ    |     10.2
 2009-01-01 03:00:02 | XYZ    |     10.4
 2009-01-01 03:00:04 | XYZ    |
(3 rows)

Using multiple time series aggregate functions

Multiple time series aggregate functions can exists in the same query. They share the same gap-filling policy as defined in the TIMESERIES clause; however, each time series aggregate function can specify its own interpolation policy. In the following example, there are two constant and one linear interpolation schemes, but all three functions use a three-second time slice:

=> SELECT slice_time, symbol,
       TS_FIRST_VALUE(bid, 'const') fv_c,
       TS_FIRST_VALUE(bid, 'linear') fv_l,
       TS_LAST_VALUE(bid, 'const') lv_c
   FROM TickStore
   TIMESERIES slice_time AS '3 seconds' OVER(PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts);

In the following output, the original output is compared to output returned by multiple time series aggregate functions.

    ts    | symbol | bid
----------+--------+------
 03:00:00 | XYZ    |   10
 03:00:05 | XYZ    | 10.5
(2 rows)

==>

     slice_time      | symbol | fv_c | fv_l | lv_c
---------------------+--------+------+------+------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 | XYZ    |   10 |   10 |   10
 2009-01-01 03:00:03 | XYZ    |   10 | 10.3 | 10.5
(2 rows)

Using the analytic LAST_VALUE function

Here's an example using LAST_VALUE(), so you can see the difference between it and the GFI syntax.

=> SELECT *, LAST_VALUE(bid) OVER(PARTITION by symbol ORDER BY ts)
   AS "last bid" FROM TickStore;

There is no gap filling and interpolation to the output values.

         ts          | symbol | bid  | last bid
---------------------+--------+------+----------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 | XYZ    |   10 |       10
 2009-01-01 03:00:05 | XYZ    | 10.5 |     10.5
(2 rows)

Using slice_time

In a TIMESERIES query, you cannot use the column slice_time in the WHERE clause because the WHERE clause is evaluated before the TIMESERIES clause, and the slice_time column is not generated until the TIMESERIES clause is evaluated. For example, OpenText™ Analytics Database does not support the following query:

=> SELECT symbol, slice_time, TS_FIRST_VALUE(bid IGNORE NULLS) AS fv
   FROM TickStore
   WHERE slice_time = '2009-01-01 03:00:00'
   TIMESERIES slice_time as '2 seconds' OVER (PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts);
ERROR:  Time Series timestamp alias/Time Series Aggregate Functions not allowed in WHERE clause

Instead, you could write a subquery and put the predicate on slice_time in the outer query:

=> SELECT * FROM (
      SELECT symbol, slice_time,
        TS_FIRST_VALUE(bid IGNORE NULLS) AS fv
      FROM TickStore
      TIMESERIES slice_time AS '2 seconds'
      OVER (PARTITION BY symbol ORDER BY ts) ) sq
   WHERE slice_time = '2009-01-01 03:00:00';
 symbol |     slice_time      | fv
--------+---------------------+----
 XYZ    | 2009-01-01 03:00:00 | 10
(1 row)

Creating a dense time series

The TIMESERIES clause provides a convenient way to create a dense time series for use in an outer join with fact data. The results represent every time point, rather than just the time points for which data exists.

The examples that follow use the same TickStore schema described in Gap filling and interpolation (GFI), along with the addition of a new inner table for the purpose of creating a join:

=> CREATE TABLE inner_table (
       ts TIMESTAMP,
       bid FLOAT
   );
=> CREATE PROJECTION inner_p (ts, bid) as SELECT * FROM inner_table
   ORDER BY ts, bid UNSEGMENTED ALL NODES;
=> INSERT INTO inner_table VALUES ('2009-01-01 03:00:02', 1);
=> INSERT INTO inner_table VALUES ('2009-01-01 03:00:04', 2);
=> COMMIT;

You can create a simple union between the start and end range of the timeframe of interest in order to return every time point. This example uses a 1-second time slice:

=> SELECT ts FROM (
     SELECT '2009-01-01 03:00:00'::TIMESTAMP AS time FROM TickStore
     UNION
     SELECT '2009-01-01 03:00:05'::TIMESTAMP FROM TickStore) t
   TIMESERIES ts AS '1 seconds' OVER(ORDER BY time);
         ts
---------------------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00
 2009-01-01 03:00:01
 2009-01-01 03:00:02
 2009-01-01 03:00:03
 2009-01-01 03:00:04
 2009-01-01 03:00:05
(6 rows)

The next query creates a union between the start and end range of the timeframe using 500-millisecond time slices:

=> SELECT ts FROM (
     SELECT '2009-01-01 03:00:00'::TIMESTAMP AS time
     FROM TickStore
     UNION
     SELECT '2009-01-01 03:00:05'::TIMESTAMP FROM TickStore) t
   TIMESERIES ts AS '500 milliseconds' OVER(ORDER BY time);
          ts
-----------------------
 2009-01-01 03:00:00
 2009-01-01 03:00:00.5
 2009-01-01 03:00:01
 2009-01-01 03:00:01.5
 2009-01-01 03:00:02
 2009-01-01 03:00:02.5
 2009-01-01 03:00:03
 2009-01-01 03:00:03.5
 2009-01-01 03:00:04
 2009-01-01 03:00:04.5
 2009-01-01 03:00:05
(11 rows)

The following query creates a union between the start- and end-range of the timeframe of interest using 1-second time slices:

=> SELECT * FROM (
     SELECT ts FROM (
       SELECT '2009-01-01 03:00:00'::timestamp AS time FROM TickStore
       UNION
       SELECT '2009-01-01 03:00:05'::timestamp FROM TickStore) t
       TIMESERIES ts AS '1 seconds' OVER(ORDER BY time) ) AS outer_table
   LEFT OUTER JOIN inner_table ON outer_table.ts = inner_table.ts;

The union returns a complete set of records from the left-joined table with the matched records in the right-joined table. Where the query found no match, it extends the right side column with null values:

         ts          |         ts          | bid
---------------------+---------------------+-----
 2009-01-01 03:00:00 |                     |
 2009-01-01 03:00:01 |                     |
 2009-01-01 03:00:02 | 2009-01-01 03:00:02 |   1
 2009-01-01 03:00:03 |                     |
 2009-01-01 03:00:04 | 2009-01-01 03:00:04 |   2
 2009-01-01 03:00:05 |                     |
(6 rows)